<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WordPress Themes by WP Diva</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wpdiva.com/themes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wpdiva.com/themes</link>
	<description>WordPress themes to dress up your blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 01:05:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>WordPress Themes Are NOT GPL, Too&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.wpdiva.com/themes/50/wordpress-themes-are-not-gpl-too.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.wpdiva.com/themes/50/wordpress-themes-are-not-gpl-too.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 01:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WordPress Diva</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wpdiva.com/themes/50/wordpress-themes-are-not-gpl-too.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They are partly GPL. What the Dev Blog&#8217;s post (WordPress Themes are GPL Too) glossed over is that only part of a WordPress theme is required to fall under GPL/compatible licensing. Here&#8217;s a plain English translation: PHP/JavaScript code that uses WordPress API/code = GPL or compatible Graphics, CSS, JavaScript that aren&#8217;t derived from GPL licensed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are <em><strong>partly</strong></em> GPL.</p>
<p>What the Dev Blog&#8217;s post (<a href="http://wordpress.org/development/2009/07/themes-are-gpl-too/" rel="nofollow">WordPress Themes are GPL Too</a>) glossed over is that <strong>only part of a WordPress theme is required to fall under GPL/compatible licensing</strong>.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a plain English translation:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>PHP/JavaScript code that uses WordPress API/code = GPL or compatible</strong></li>
<li><strong>Graphics, CSS, JavaScript that aren&#8217;t derived from GPL licensed graphics, CSS, or Javascript = Whatever license the creator chooses</strong></li>
</ul>
<p>What that missive fails to understand is that most designers don&#8217;t necessarily give too much of a hoot about the underlying PHP code, <strong>it&#8217;s the graphics and styling</strong>.</p>
<p>In some cases, I&#8217;ve done WP themes that use hand drawn sketches that have taken me days to render and color. Unfortunately, there will be too many people who just read the post&#8217;s title without actually reading the content and will think they have a claim to that hard work to do with it as they please because it&#8217;s automatically part of the GPL. Here&#8217;s the kicker, <strong>it&#8217;s not</strong>. It&#8217;s not GPL unless the creator says so. In fact, it may end up being copyright infringement.</p>
<p>Think about a theme that was ported from a different system that uses another designer&#8217;s artwork. It&#8217;s uploaded to the WP theme viewer. People are going to assume the artwork is GPL too since, during the port over to WordPress, the original license terms were blurred. What happens when the original creator of the artwork begins policing it?</p>
<p>Plus, the woefully unclear Dev Blog post might mean more designers stop designing for WP once they realize their artwork may be at the mercy of GPL. Or even because of the threat of others not understanding that their artwork is licensed differently than the underlying theme files.</p>
<p>Is it possible to turn this new development into a business model? Of course. There&#8217;s even a <a href="http://wank.wordpress.com/2009/07/02/it-is-what-it-is/">discussion over at WordPress Wank</a>. Theme developers can simply release their <em>underlying theme code</em> for free and using the GPL license, then those people who want to dress up their blogs (and think about it, what&#8217;s the main reason people select a theme? It&#8217;s about the look) can purchase a design separately (i.e. CSS/Images/JavaScript).</p>
<p>Will it work? Maybe, maybe not. Only time will answer that question. But it would be considerably difficult since WordPress.org will only support theme developers who release <em>everything</em>, including images/CSS, under the GPL or compatible license and not every designer is comfortable with that. There are some who are willing, but without fresh new ideas, those designs (because every designer has his/her own personal style) will get very stale very fast.</p>
<p>Overall, I believe this whole discussion which has been trampled nearly to death is about one thing, and one thing only: respect. Designers would just like to have a bit of respect for their work. It&#8217;s the same with plugin developers and even WP volunteers. People should extend the same courtesy and respect they expect for themselves to others, and we wouldn&#8217;t be in this mess at all. Unfortunately, that&#8217;s called Utopia and it doesn&#8217;t exist.</p>
<p>(By the way, since most people don&#8217;t seem to know this, WordPress is GPL because it&#8217;s a derivative of b2.)</p>
<p>Further reading:<br />
<strong><a href="http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/825/getting-pretty-lonely">Getting Pretty Lonely</a></strong>: an excellent essay explaining why the GPL license may be detrimental to commercial developers.<br />
<strong><a href="http://wank.wordpress.com/2009/07/05/gifts/">gifts</a></strong>: a very insightful comment by WordPress Wank that somehow disappeared from <a href="http://foolswisdom.com/commercial-wordpress-themes-gpl2/" rel="nofollow">Lloyd&#8217;s post</a> on themes being GPL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wpdiva.com/themes/50/wordpress-themes-are-not-gpl-too.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Original WordPress Diva</title>
		<link>http://www.wpdiva.com/themes/49/the-original-wordpress-diva.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.wpdiva.com/themes/49/the-original-wordpress-diva.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 16:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WordPress Diva</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wpdiva.com/themes/49/the-original-wordpress-diva.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m surprised to learn that there are some people out there who appreciate me and my title so much that they&#8217;ve decided to start calling themselves the WordPress Diva. I just wanted to publish a quick note letting everyone know that this site has been the home of the original WordPress Diva since 2006 and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised to learn that there are some people out there who appreciate me and my title so much that they&#8217;ve decided to start calling themselves the WordPress Diva. </p>
<p>I just wanted to publish a quick note letting everyone know that this site has been the home of the original WordPress Diva since 2006 and though some people will try to ride the WP Diva wave, they aren&#8217;t the originals. (The original would use a WordPress theme she developed herself.) It&#8217;s flattering though. <img src='http://www.wpdiva.com/themes/0/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>In other news, I&#8217;ve decided that it&#8217;s time to sell the WP Diva brand and website. I had a great many things planned for the site, but unfortunately, not enough time to execute it all. <a href="www.prweb.com/releases/2009/05/prweb2434984.htm">The press release has already gone out</a> and I will be updating this site with the screen shots of the site stats. </p>
<p>Interested parties can send an email to <strong>sale AT wpdiva DOT com</strong>. Remember to replace the AT with @ and DOT with a period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wpdiva.com/themes/49/the-original-wordpress-diva.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ethical Theme Sponsorship Links</title>
		<link>http://www.wpdiva.com/themes/48/ethical-theme-sponsorship-links.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.wpdiva.com/themes/48/ethical-theme-sponsorship-links.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 04:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WordPress Diva</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wpdiva.com/themes/48/ethical-theme-sponsorship-links.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I PERSONALLY think that if I were to use a sponsored theme (and I never will) that this “sponsor” should pay ME to have his link there since he’s getting all his linky love off my site. But that’s just me. (Jenny) With a response by Thomas: Then Jenny you should pay the designer for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><em>I PERSONALLY think that if I were to use a sponsored theme (and I never will) that this “sponsor” should pay ME to have his link there since he’s getting all his linky love off my site. But that’s just me. (<a href="http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/04/09/sponsored-themes/#comment-1157539">Jenny</a>)</em></p>
<p><em>With a response by Thomas:</em></p>
<p><em>Then Jenny you should pay the designer for the theme you are using expect for (semi-)professional bloggers no one wants to pay for the themes he uses. (<a href="http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/04/09/sponsored-themes/#comment-1157540">Thomas</a>)</em>
</p></blockquote>
<p>Thomas makes a valid point. It seems that the people who want something for nothing are the ones who ultimately forget or don&#8217;t fully understand what goes into the production of a single, quality WordPress theme.</p>
<p>Creating a good theme can be an <strong>hours</strong> long project; themes simply don&#8217;t spring to life out of thin air.</p>
<ul>
<li>Layout planning</li>
<li>Color and font selection</li>
<li>Graphic creation and, in some cases, stock image purchase</li>
<li>Slicing, dicing, and coding</li>
<li>Testing and tweaking</li>
<li>Supporting the finished product</li>
</ul>
<p>Often, the designers do it for the sheer enjoyment of designing a nice theme, but the hours spent creating that <em>free to use</em> theme are hours that aren&#8217;t spent on a paying project. Sure, the theme designer could slap up a donation button, but the fact is that people rarely donate, even when the button is in their face; the amount of donations a theme designer may receive in a year probably wouldn&#8217;t even cover an hour spent on the theme production and support.</p>
<p>Not all theme designers are in a position where someone else supports them &#8212; providing shelter, buying groceries, and paying the bills. In other words, some theme designers are only able to produce the free themes if it is part of their overall livelihood. Adding a sponsored link is a way to curtail the financial obligations associated with producing the theme. In essence, the link becomes a non-monetary donation from the end user to the theme designer.</p>
<p>With all of that said, there definitely does need to be some basic ethical standards for sponsored themes to make it a win-win-win situation all around. <span id="more-48"></span></p>
<p><strong>For the theme designers:</strong></p>
<h3>Quality, Not Quantity</h3>
<p>It&#8217;s true that some theme designers will put out a sub-standard theme simply because someone paid for the sponsor link. But, in doing so, these theme designers are only harming themselves in the long run. People will not be inclined to use or recommend a theme that looks like crap or doesn&#8217;t function properly.</p>
<p>There is actually software on the market for the sole purpose of mass-producing themes based on the Kubrick theme (and I don&#8217;t plan to link to it), which is a shame. Instead of producing hackneyed themes based on the Kubrick model, take the time to craft a good theme, test it, and support it as much as possible. In the end, more people will appreciate the theme, your hard work, and the sponsor link will be justifiable.</p>
<h3>Limit Sponsor Links</h3>
<p><strong>No theme needs more than one sponsor link</strong>; themes with two, three, seven plus sponsor links are simply created for the sole purpose of spam and not because the theme author enjoys creating themes. And it&#8217;s appalling.</p>
<p>A single sponsor link should be enough to cover the cost of theme production and by limiting the number of sponsor links in a theme, you&#8217;re showing courtesy to your end theme user. Remember, their blog is <em>not</em> a free-for-all link directory and the single link is their donation to you.</p>
<h3>Be Discriminating</h3>
<p><strong>Not everyone who offers to purchase a link on your theme should be afforded the opportunity to do so</strong>. Again, it comes back to respecting the theme user&#8217;s website. Consider that people with various sensibilities will be using your themes, so it pays to have a discriminating eye when it comes to selecting theme sponsors.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Don&#8217;t publish links to splogs, MFA (made for AdSense), or non-sense websites</strong>. The site should have a valid purpose and be useful to human visitors, not just search engine robots.</li>
<li><strong>Avoid linking to NSFW (or kids) websites.</strong> If you do link out to these types of sites, disclose it prominently.</li>
<li><strong>Monitor the links</strong>. Some people will let their domain names lapse, and some people will just try to be plain sneaky. Have rules in place and if the content changes or starts redirecting to a poorer quality site, then change the links in the theme immediately and issue a theme update.</li>
</ul>
<p>Above all else, remember to <strong>respect your theme user&#8217;s website</strong>. If you do this, it will be reflected in your work.</p>
<p><strong>For theme users:</strong></p>
<h3>Theme Designers Aren&#8217;t Obligated to You</h3>
<p>The theme designers are providing you with a theme that you would have needed to create yourself or pay someone to create for you &#8212; in essence, they are providing you with their services at no cost. The least you can do is respect the theme designer&#8217;s terms (different designers will have different terms).</p>
<p>If there is a theme you especially love, but you don&#8217;t love the theme sponsor, contact the theme designer to work something out.</p>
<ul>
<li>Offer to donate a certain amount of money as compensation to remove the link. Most theme designers are obliging in that way.</li>
<li>Offer to pay for theme customizations and support requests.</li>
<li>Commission a custom design based on the theme.</li>
<li><strong>Use a different theme.</strong></li>
</ul>
<p>The final point is in bold because there is nothing stating that you absolutely must use a particular designer&#8217;s theme. Frankly, if you don&#8217;t agree with the linking policy, or sponsorship policy, or terms of use, then you truly shouldn&#8217;t be using the theme anyway. There are hundreds, <em>if not thousands</em>, of freely available themes that do not have specific restrictions on their use.</p>
<p><strong>Just as the designer is to respect you as the user, you should also extend the same courtesy to the theme designer.</strong></p>
<h3>Finishing Up</h3>
<p>Not all theme designers who provide a sponsor link in their themes are bad people, merely people who&#8217;d like to eat and possibly care for their family. Though there are a few people out there who seek to abuse the situation, they are the exception, not the rule.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Free to view television channels have commercials because those advertisers make it possible to bring you the programming you love. If you want to get away from those commercials, you can switch to a premium channel, such as HBO or Showtime, or purchase a Tivo, but those premium channels and Tivo come with a price.</em></p>
<p><em>Sponsor links are like commercials on the free to view channels; If you don&#8217;t like the commercials, pay the premium.</em></p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wpdiva.com/themes/48/ethical-theme-sponsorship-links.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
